After first watching Netflix's Making a Murderer, it's pretty easy to jump on the "Steven Avery is innocent" bandwagon, but does the popular documentary give viewers the full story? The first season came under a lot of criticism for omitting important bits of evidence, but the creators of the show claimed that it would have been impossible to add every single detail — it "wouldn't have made a difference anyway." The question is, should viewers take their word for it or do a little digging themselves? There's always more to a story than what meets the eye, particularly when there's money involved. Here are 10 key pieces of evidence that the show left out.